weeabird: (28)
Simon Blackquill ([personal profile] weeabird) wrote in [community profile] the_newlydead_game 2017-03-08 03:25 am (UTC)

[ Simon clears his throat loudly, and Taka screeches for good measure. That's right, everyone, it's time for "Some Asshole Bossing People Around" O'clock! ]

Yesterday, a question was posed: If indeed the "winner" of the vote is tasked with executing the "loser," can we, in good conscience, continue on with our previous plan? It would be ludicrous to assume that everyone will cooperate, after all. What's more, our current volunteer, Kay Faraday, does not wish to take a life.

I would like to suggest an alternate plan. Rather than concentrating on those we wish to safeguard, we should turn our votes against those from whom we are safeguarding ourselves: Namely, those who cannot cooperate with the group. Fiona has confessed to voting for Handsome Jack, and Matt Engarde was almost certainly the vote on Fey-dono, a person from his past who can personally attest that he is not the harmless dimwit he is pretending to be, but rather a savage stalker, kidnapper, and murderer.

My proposal is this: All those who do not wish blood on their hands, vote to oust Fiona. All those who can live with the result of their choice results ending with a man losing his life, vote for Engarde. As the former has no issue with vigilante justice, it should not be difficult for her to enact it against him, and the number of people whose personal agendas conflict with the safety of the rest of us is narrowed by two.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting