Kentucky McGiygas (
kentucky_mcgiygas) wrote in
the_newlydead_game2017-03-17 07:04 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Day 7
Today we have something exciting for you, Mackentuckyfuckians! This is going to be a D-D-D-DOUBLE ROUND! That means each of you get TWO VOTES for the price of one! They can't be for the same person!
As for our immunity challenge, it's a game some of you may have heard of - Never Have I Ever! And in the spirit of McDouble Day, we're going to be awarding TWO immunities this week! DETAILS INSIDE!
((Vote here!
Game navigation
Private posts
Character Status
PLOT-RELATED THREADS:
Hanzo leads the voting discussion
Ronald makes an announcement))
As for our immunity challenge, it's a game some of you may have heard of - Never Have I Ever! And in the spirit of McDouble Day, we're going to be awarding TWO immunities this week! DETAILS INSIDE!
((Vote here!
Game navigation
Private posts
Character Status
PLOT-RELATED THREADS:
Hanzo leads the voting discussion
Ronald makes an announcement))
no subject
If it has not all escaped your notice, the rules of this round have changed. In light of this, we should discuss strategy before we grow too occupied with the immunity challenge.
Assuming we have two candidates we can all decide upon a split vote with as before, I suggest we take our second votes and simply vote for ourselves. That way, the votes remain evenly spread, and no one will be any more at risk than anyone else by stray voters.
If anyone has any thoughts, I would like to hear them.
no subject
Perhaps if a tie were to be forced, it would be the same as a unanimous vote.
no subject
Ooh, fun! If you all agree on two people, that definitely counts as unanimous! I'll allow it!
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
The group may need some reassurance in voting for themselves, but that could work. There's been no collusion between the stray voters thus far, so the risk would be minimal.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Hmm... you really think there's a chance we just prevent elimination? We'll be stuck if nobody is eliminated at all. The goal is to get people out of here. If we tie two people, they might both go free.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Brace yourselves for a possible sugar rush.]
That sounds better than just trying to get two people to tie for the votes...it'll be harder to get everyone to cooperate for that.
no subject
[Especially when some of them are on crack or just. Drinking. Nonstop.]
Have you decided whether you would like to get disqualified yet, Kay? Now that we have established you would not be asked to kill, there is little risk involved.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
...What happens if someone who has immunity gets second place?
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)