Kentucky McGiygas (
kentucky_mcgiygas) wrote in
the_newlydead_game2017-03-03 06:22 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Day 3
[ A bright new day has dawned, maybe. It's not like you can see the outside world. But the tablets keep diligent track of time, and promptly at 6am they provide something for you: A new immunity challenge. ]
((Game navigation
Private posts
Vote thread. Again, DO NOT FORGET TO VOTE. I will actually idle people this week!))
((Game navigation
Private posts
Vote thread. Again, DO NOT FORGET TO VOTE. I will actually idle people this week!))
no subject
no subject
Will you perhaps share your knowledge of anyone else present you know of, who would also have knowledge of this 'Handsome Jack'? I suppose in your terms, from 'your part' of that galaxy.
Furthermore, I must hear your answer to this next question. Your agreement would suggest you would avoid placing your vote on Handsome Jack... but there is no term in your agreement where you would not encourage others to place their vote on this Handsome Jack, non? It is an easy loophole. Did you, perhaps, encourage someone else to direct their vote for anyone but Ticky Mikk? Or perhaps do so indirectly, such as by mentioning offhandedly to someone: 'Watch out for that Handsome Jack, he is a mass-murderer!'?
no subject
I guess I could have encouraged other people to kill him, and maybe I would have done that later [he sounds a little unsure on this, though] —but I didn't, not this round. I think the only person I mentioned him being kinda crazy to was Aura, and she says she didn't vote for him. Maybe she's lying, but it didn't seem like it...
no subject
Hm. If what you say is indeed true, then the possibility has been narrowed down to that of Fiona herself encouraging others to vote for Handsome Jack, that Handsome Jack himself made at least two more enemies in his time here, or that it was the result of a random vote.
no subject
no subject
no subject
But same to you, I guess.