Kentucky McGiygas (
kentucky_mcgiygas) wrote in
the_newlydead_game2017-03-03 06:22 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Day 3
[ A bright new day has dawned, maybe. It's not like you can see the outside world. But the tablets keep diligent track of time, and promptly at 6am they provide something for you: A new immunity challenge. ]
((Game navigation
Private posts
Vote thread. Again, DO NOT FORGET TO VOTE. I will actually idle people this week!))
((Game navigation
Private posts
Vote thread. Again, DO NOT FORGET TO VOTE. I will actually idle people this week!))
no subject
Look. It's just to let kids go first if they want to.
no subject
Sorry look I'm not trying to beat on a dead horse or anything I guess I'm actually just curious about the reasoning. Whether it's because you think being legally unable to bone someone or get drunk just makes someone inherently more valuable or innocent or tragic. Like, why age and not basically any other arbitrary trait like family or degree of completion of life dreams or if someone is a dickbag or liklihood that their siblings will rip apart space time and cause the McDrumstick Apocalypse, killing millions of people who may or may not already be dead.
It just seems like a pretty flaccid reason "Definitely don't kill me because I am like 13." Okay cool I'm thirty two I have like TWICE the amount of investment in living and emotional fallout if I die.
no subject
... Well, it's possible it's just a permanent value society has etched into most humans. Protect and value children. Even if an adult hasn't amounted to anything, you've had more time to take a shot at it. Inherently, maybe it's time that older people value the most, because the more that you experience and underperform, the more you realize how valuable it is. So kids have more time, so you're saving something of more value than yourself if you protect someone younger than you. Something with a lot more potential, if it's given the chance.
That's just black and white though, I'm not saying you're wrong that there are some kids who are less innocent than some adults, or that an adult's life and dreams are inherently worth less than a child's. Plus it's not like all adults grow up. Or maybe a doctor who's seventy but capable of saving a million lives wants to save his own life, fine.
Just for this situation though, we don't even have to have that conversation. We don't have to pick "only five." This is just a way to pick order. I guess everyone who wants to get voted out could draw a number out of a hat, but I still wouldn't personally want to save myself before, for example, you.
no subject
I feel you. I'm honestly not trying to be "Devil's Advocate" or some horseshit like that which would be stupid. I'm just trying to figure out what to do. I think because I was the 'time guy', and maybe also because I haven't clocked a whole lot of linear time compared to most adults, I see time more as a more subjective element. It ain't really a surprise that I might be out of it given how much I fucked around with it.
no subject
So, you're a literal time traveler? Or something more involved than just that, if time is completely subjective?
no subject
Time traveler is literally the corniest way you could put it. Makes it sound like I popped back to have high tea with George Washington and get my ass oogled by Socrates. Fuck no.
no subject
Okay, so what's the situation? Now I'm curious.
no subject
no subject
no subject
[He glances at the board again, almost seems like he's going to write his name and then just goes back to awkwardly getting red chalk all over his hands because I remembered this is a blackboard.]
Not saying I don't want to fucking bounce but you can hold off on me, I'll be okay. Not my first murder clown rodeo. You're a pretty good dude for sticking your neck out.
no subject
no subject
no subject